German parents can be held responsible for their children’s illegal acts on the internet. It is the court’s opinion that parents have a duty to monitor what their children are doing.
The mother (since we’re talking parents and the story in the woman is a “she”) said that the children were forbidden from engaging in “ in copyright-infringing behaviour.” [sic]
Nevertheless, illegally donwloaded songs were found on their home computer, which is what prompted the lawsuit by record labels.
Pretty harsh. Once upon a time, I was a child myself (duh, really?), and I can verify that I didn’t follow my parent’s wishes; furthermore, I made sure that I would hide my tracks when I did not follow my parent’s wishes. I ask, aren’t most children this way?
I guess Germans are a special breed. This type of law wouldn’t fly in other nations, apparently:
Both Scots law and English law state that a parent generally is not liable for the actions of their child, and that a civil judgment is as binding on a child as it is on an adult.
There are however, some circumstances in which a parent can become responsible for the child’s actions. That can happen when a child causes injury to others or where a parent has previously authorised or subsequently ratified the child’s unlawful act.
I imagine that this is the case for most nations worldwide. I mean, can you imagine the ramifications if it weren’t? Children are little terrors.

