Hm…some very serious allegation have surfaced in the case regarding the PA high school that was spying on its students via school-issued laptops.
According to this particular post, that goes really in depth,
In a strange twist, the makers of LANRev have come out with a statement saying that school network techs should never have used their software to engage in theft recovery:
“We discourage any customer from taking theft recovery into their own hands,” said Stephen Midgley, the company’s head of marketing, in an interview Monday. “That’s best left in the hands of professionals.”
I’ve watched the 50 minute screencast repeatedly, where Perbix describes his use of this feature outside of school grounds repeatedlyduring a conversation with Absolute Software employees. They were enthusiastic… now they’re throwing LMSD under the bus? I believe this can best be described as intense PR spin. It also completely confirms what I’ve asserted here, that LANRev was the implant of choice for this school. [my emphasis]
Perbix is supposedly one of the school’s IT admins. What the blogger is referring to in regards to the PR spin is this interview with computerworld.com, where
Absolute’s Midgley declined to speculate about whether his company might be liable to legal action for LANRev’s part in the alleged spying on students, but put the responsibility solely on the school district.
“The customer acted on their own to do what they did,” he said.
Midgley is the head of marketing at Absolute, according to the computerworld.com article, so what else would one expect other than PR? On the other hand, this would very well be a case of the guys at top, at their respective company and school, not knowing what their underlings are doing…in fact, that’s the argument I would make in defending myself.
BTW, I don’t share the above blogger’s notion of LMSD “being thrown under the bus.” Just like the manufacturer of a knife can’t be responsible for some guy stabbing another guy, Absolute can’t held responsible for stupidity by a particular school because they happened to use Absolute’s software (actually, part of the portfolio of an acquisition). As for “enthusiastic employees”…well, I’m not crazy about them being enthusiastic about breaches of privacy;maybe they didn’t know, or maybe they thought all the issues were squared away. Or maybe they thought the guy wouldn’t really implement what he was describing and showing off. Or maybe they’re idiots that will get fired; who knows?
The point is, I’m not going to blame the software company for a situation that was created by imbeciles.